Find the Perfect Quote | Explore Our Curated Categories for Every Occasion

You are not just going out there, maybe sacrificing your own life. There is also sacrifices still going on at home. You can serve in the military and have a good marriage, but you just need to be aware of it so you can take those steps to take care of it.

I do love to have children, and I think marriage is great, I really do.

It is very trying on a marriage when you are doing a one hour show, week after week after week. You do not have enough time for people that maybe you should have top priority.

To us marriage is first, everything else is second.

I do not believe that defending traditional marriage between one man and one woman excludes anybody or usurps anybody's civil rights and denies anybody their civil rights.

If you leave your wife and you do not ever contact her again, that says something about how you felt about the marriage.

I found marriage somewhat stifling. I do not know that I am the kind of man who ought to be married.

What we need are not prohibitory marriage laws, but a reformed society, an educated public opinion which will teach individual duty in these matters.

I know I am guilty of and I think a lot of people are guilty of sort of getting starry-eyed with love and sort of looking over the bad things and keep going and you do not really prepare for how much work marriage really is.

That is why I fought against abortion and that is why if I were still in the Senate I would be doing everything I could to defend the sanctity of marriage.

I am knocking our pitiful, pathetic lawmakers. And I thank God that President Bush has stated, we need a Constitutional amendment that states that marriage is between a man and a woman.

I know in my own marriage I stayed in it to provide my son with what I thought was a stable background and to give him what I thought was the family life a child should have with two parents. But that is not always the best way, and it took me taking my son to therapy after the divorce to really see it.

I think church and state should remain entirely separate at all costs, and that the decision of religious marriage should be of each faith to debate and decide free of political influence.

I have a wonderful marriage and two great kids.

I did know Ted Hughes and I partly wrote the book to explain to myself and others the complexities of a marriage that was for six years wonderfully productive of poetry and then ended in tragedy.

I found it an interesting portrait of a marriage in exploring notions of how one partner supports the other, whilst not jeopardizing the greater good - which is the family.

I know there are a lot of readers that think I have got a very crappy marriage just because of the things going on with Rick and Lori but there is really nothing that is been like a mirror. I am just making this stuff up.

No Government has the moral authority to dismantle the universally understood meaning of marriage.

The church's teaching on marriage is unequivocal, it is uniquely, the union of a man and a woman and it is wrong that governments, politicians or parliaments should seek to alter or destroy that reality.

If marriage can be redefined so that it no longer means a man and a woman but two men or two women, why stop there? Why not allow three men or a woman and two men to constitute a marriage?